在精神衛生日益成為全球公共衛生優先議題的當下,科學研究在推動學科發展、促進臨床實踐革新方面發揮著關鍵作用。劍橋大學出版社始終致力於透過推動精神病學領域的知識生產與經驗共享——劍橋大學出版社出版多種精神病學領域的領先期刊。其中,與英國皇家精神科醫學院合作出版5種期刊,包括旗艦期刊 British Journal of Psychiatry,BJPsych Open,BJPsych Bulletin,BJPsych Adances 和 BJPsych International。BJPsych 系列期刊聚焦精神病學的臨床研究與診療實踐,為精神科醫生及心理健康專業人士提供及時、可靠的研究成果和實踐指南。
The British Journal of Psychiatry
The British Journal of Psychiatry 是世界領先的同行評審期刊之一,涵蓋精神病學的所有分支,重點關注每個主題的臨床研究。是劍橋大學出版社代表英國皇家精神病學院出版的一系列期刊中的旗艦期刊。

期刊表現*
-
影響因子: 8.7
-
JIF分割槽: Q1 (Psychiatry – SCIE)
-
Cite Score: 13.7
-
Scopus分割槽: Q1(Medicine – Psychiatry and Mental Health)
-
CAS大類及分割槽: Q1(醫學)
-
CAS小類及分割槽: Q1(精神病學)
出版資訊
-
每年出版12期
-
審稿週期**:從提交到首次決定的中位數: 4天從提交論文到收到終審決定的中位數: 2天
-
混合期刊,接收OA文章
The British Journal of Psychiatry主編專訪
BJPsych International
BJPsych International 是一本經由同行評審的完全開放獲取期刊,引入全球視角,為精神科醫生和心理健康專業人士提供精神科醫學最新研究與實踐成果,內容涉及心理健康政策的新發展、心理健康服務管理的新方法以及全球精神科醫學教學與培訓。本刊出版原創性論文、具有國際視野的系統綜述和薈萃分析,期刊歡迎來自中低收入國家及地區作者的研究成果。

期刊表現*
-
Cite Score: 4.7
-
Scopus分割槽: Q2 (Medicine – Psychiatry and Mental Health)
出版資訊
-
每年出版4期
-
審稿週期**:從提交到首次決定的中位數: 41天從提交到收到終審決定的中位數: 57天
-
完全開放獲取期刊,接受OA文章
BJPsych Advances
BJPsych Advances 是一本專為精神科醫師職業發展量身定製的學術期刊。本刊由頂尖臨床專家撰寫並經同行評審,系統整合最新臨床研究成果,內容涵蓋治療生理與生物學機制、心理及社會學干預策略、臨床管理規範與精神科亞專科特色療法。每期透過深度解析臨床難題的綜合性解決方案,輔以自測題(MCQ)及專家述評等實用板塊。作為精神衛生領域從業者的必備讀物,本刊持續追蹤學科前沿動態,助力臨床工作者精準掌握最新診療理念與技術發展。

期刊表現*
-
影響因子: 1.7
-
JIF分割槽: Q3 (Psychiatry – ESCI)
出版資訊
-
每年出版6期
-
審稿週期**:
-
從提交到首次決定的中位數:53天從提交論文到做出最終決定的中位數:68天
-
完全開放獲取期刊,接受OA文章
BJPsych 系列其他期刊

Artificial intelligence and increasing misinformation
Scott Monteith, Tasha Glenn, et al.
The British Journal of Psychiatry
摘 要
With the recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), patients are increasingly exposed to misleading medical information. Generative AI models, including large language models such as ChatGPT, create and modify text, images, audio and video information based on training data. Commercial use of generative AI is expanding rapidly and the public will routinely receive messages created by generative AI. However, generative AI models may be unreliable, routinely make errors and widely spread misinformation. Misinformation created by generative AI about mental illness may include factual errors, nonsense, fabricated sources and dangerous advice. Psychiatrists need to recognise that patients may receive misinformation online, including about medicine and psychiatry.

DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2023.136
掃碼檢視論文原文
Psychosocial and behavioural interventions for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a systematic review of efficacy meta-analyses
Matteo Cella, Safina Roberts, et al.
The British Journal of Psychiatry
摘 要
Background
Currently there is no first-line treatment recommended for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Psychosocial and behavioural interventions are widely used to reduce the burden of negative symptoms. Meta-analytic studies have summarised the evidence for specific approaches but not compared evidence quality and benefit.
Aim
To review and evaluate the evidence from meta-analytic studies of psychosocial and behavioural interventions for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.
Method
A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify all meta-analyses evaluating psychosocial and behavioural interventions reporting on negative symptom outcomes in people with schizophrenia. Data on intervention, study characteristics, acceptability and outcome were extracted. Risk of bias was evaluated. Results were summarised descriptively, and evidence ranked on methodological quality.
Results
In total, 31 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria evaluating the efficacy of negative symptom interventions on 33 141 participants. Exercise interventions showed effect sizes (reduction in negative symptoms) ranging from −0.59 to −0.24 and psychological interventions ranging from −0.65 to −0.04. Attrition ranged between 12% to 32%. Across the studies considered heterogeneity varied substantially (range 0–100). Most of the reviews were of very low to low methodological quality. Methodological quality ranking suggested that the effect size for cognitive remediation and exercise therapy may be more robust compared with other approaches.
Conclusions
Most of the interventions considered had a small-to-moderate effect size, good acceptability levels but very few had negative symptoms as the primary intervention target. To improve the confidence of these effect sizes being replicated in clinical settings future studies should minimise risk of bias.

DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2023.21
掃碼檢視論文原文
Do no harm: can school mental health interventions cause iatrogenic harm?
Lucy Foulkes and Argyris Stringaris
BJPsych Bulletin
摘 要
In recent years, there have been extensive efforts in secondary schools to prevent, treat and raise awareness of adolescent mental health problems. For some adolescents, these efforts are essential and will lead to a reduction in clinical symptoms. However, it is also vital to assess whether, for others, the current approach might be causing iatrogenic harm. A growing body of quantitative research indicates that some aspects of school-based mental health interventions increase distress or clinical symptoms, relative to control activities, and qualitative work indicates that this may be partly due to the interventions themselves.

DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2023.9
掃碼檢視論文原文
Economic burden of mental illness in Pakistan: an estimation for the year 2020 from existing evidence
Mohsin Hassan Alvi, Tehmina Ashraf, et al.
BJPsych International
摘 要
This report is based on the extrapolation to 2020 of data on the economic burden of mental illnesses in Pakistan in 2006. Given the resultant estimated high economic burden of mental illness in the country (£2.97 billion in 2020), we advocate a revised budget allocation to mental healthcare. As a resource-scarce nation that is entangled in natural disasters, Pakistan needs cost-effective psychological interventions such as culturally adapted manual-assisted problem-solving training (C-MAP) for the prevention of self-harm and suicide and to move towards attaining the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Although government has taken initiatives to support healthcare services (such as the Sehat Sahulat Program for universal health coverage), there is still a need to implement a cost-effective national digital model for mental healthcare such as the Agha Khan Development Network Digital Health Programme.

DOI: 10.1192/bji.2023.4
掃碼檢視論文原文
Therapeutic monitoring of plasma clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine (norclozapine): practical considerations
Robert J. Flanagan, Siobhan Gee, et al.
BJPsych Advances
摘 要
Clozapine dose assessment in treatment-refractory schizophrenia is complicated. There is a narrow margin between an effective and a potentially toxic dose and wide inter-individual variation in clozapine metabolic capacity. Moreover, factors such as changes in smoking habit, infection/inflammation, co-prescription of certain drugs, notably fluvoxamine, and age alter the dose requirement within individuals. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of plasma clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine (norclozapine) can help assess adherence, guide dosage and guard against toxicity. This article gives an overview of clozapine pharmacokinetics and factors affecting clozapine dose requirements. It then outlines the procedures and processes of clozapine TDM, from taking the blood sample for laboratory assay or point-of-contact (finger-prick) testing (POCT) to interpreting and acting on the results.

DOI: 10.1192/bja.2022.71
掃碼檢視論文原文


瞭解更多British Journal of Psychiatry期刊資訊,請點選“閱讀原文”或下方連結:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
歡迎掃描下方二維碼,免費訂閱劍橋大學出版社郵件,隨時掌握最新學術資訊。

*期刊指標資料來源於2023 Journal Citation Reports © Clarivate Analytics 2024,以及2025年中科院文獻情報中心分割槽表。
**本文僅提供稿件處理週期的中位數作為參考,實際處理過程應以具體情況為準。